From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:58:52 -0800
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20181129155852.GA69882@wopr>
References: <63b2327cd089137c1819d6993347430a@kathe.in>
	<CAEoi9W5DzDy8EBoDJaKojoB5Ah8Oz_tNt9yP39HZOUpr2QRcUw@mail.gmail.com>
	<ecb4cdd415330e0229cd73ace8dee1c6@kathe.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ecb4cdd415330e0229cd73ace8dee1c6@kathe.in>
Subject: Re: [9fans] upas : without acme : possible?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: efa7296c-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 08:27:09PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
>
> is that "mail" you mention similar to "mailx" under unix-like systems?
> the problem is one of not wanting a captive user-interface to the
> mailing sub-system.
>

You're looking for nedmail(1), I think.  Hopefully sl will chime in;
he's got a pile of scripts revolving around this idea.

khm