From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>
Date: Fri,  4 Jan 2013 14:35:16 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <201d9a8bee52558d8e1d7ae6430935d3@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJd0wvDkaaZzNFfnWyTnA+3iA3k9R+0xKS1JeLXVoD6J2A0U7g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130104194803.02fa087b@zinc.9fans.fr>
	<6e680bde0bcfb96fa20d42f2371e075f@hamnavoe.com>
	<CAJd0wvDkaaZzNFfnWyTnA+3iA3k9R+0xKS1JeLXVoD6J2A0U7g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9atom
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fe076e38-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> It's funny, if you were correcting someone else's bug unknowingly
> introduced by a one-line change your fix could justifiably be one line, but
> then you would think the odds of it reoccurring in the future would be
> non-zero, and you might as well add a comment for future fumblers. :)

insuring that asymptoticly, your code reaches heat death as the
comment/code ratio goes infinite.  :-)

- erik