9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Staal <staal1978@gmail.com>
To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] patches from 9front
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:57:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210211085739.4lwrl3z5pdtsfhae@Krypton> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJQ9t7hyeQ94P0_5JcWsNCo6+W2Rj9iuxVHZb1v4pb2pX7mC+A@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:24:38AM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote:
> On 2/11/21, ori@eigenstate.org <ori@eigenstate.org> wrote:
> > Quoth David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>:
> >> 9legacy patches are available as "unified diff" format and
> >> are generated with "ape/diff -Nru".
> >
> > Alright, noted for the future.
> >
> 
> Here's what I' ve been thinking about that may be worth sharing: I'd
> like to have working 9legacy, 9pi (which I'd like to call 9muller,
> frankly, if only for clarity, but also because it is what I run on my
> i386 workstation, not yet the network server), 9atom and last, just to
> emphasise it is NOT least, 9front. Each of those have useful
> differences and even though I never really make any progress, I like
> to think that there is "One plan 9" struggling to be born from these
> variations.
>

That would be great. One could even think of a model where there is a
common repository for the "common base" (sort of like illumos) and that
the current OSes remain with their own identities as "distros" or
"spins" from that common base.

It is not bad per se that people have differing visions and/or community
cultures, and that these can be cultivated in different ways. With a
common base/upstream, improvements to one could easily also be
implemented by the others.

Personally I would love to see a "spin" that takes Sigrid's 9front rio
modifications for workspaces and theming and make them default. For me
that has become a huge improvement in the UI of Plan9. Hopefully that
work will continue and improve further.

> Would the Plan 9 Foundation be interested in proposing to this
> community that such a concept be pursued and properly maintained and
> laying down a project path to achieve this objective? Could there be
> much smaller portions of such an objective that could be progressively
> achieved in a distributed, centrally managed manner?
> 

Hosting the common base at the foundation would be logical, I think.

> Lucio

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tc82939f1fda0e479-M172301466cce16502dcd2993
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-11  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-10  3:27 Eli Cohen
2021-02-10  3:37 ` Lucio De Re
2021-02-10  3:47   ` Eli Cohen
2021-02-10  4:14     ` Lucio De Re
2021-02-10  7:24     ` Skip Tavakkolian
2021-02-10 16:15       ` ori
2021-02-10 21:50         ` Eli Cohen
2021-02-10 22:00           ` ori
2021-02-10 22:26             ` David du Colombier
2021-02-11  5:49               ` ori
2021-02-11  7:24                 ` Lucio De Re
2021-02-11  8:57                   ` Jens Staal [this message]
2021-02-11 10:31                   ` hiro
2021-02-11 11:57                     ` Lucio De Re
2021-02-11 13:07                       ` hiro
2021-02-11 17:41                       ` pouya+lists.9fans
2021-02-11  8:40                 ` David du Colombier
2021-02-12  1:21                   ` ori
2021-02-12  2:55                     ` Skip Tavakkolian
2021-02-12 17:42                       ` ori
2021-02-12 17:48                         ` sirjofri
2021-02-12 18:09                           ` ori
2021-02-12 20:46                             ` Lucio De Re
2021-02-12 23:54                               ` Anthony Martin
2021-02-13 13:34                               ` hiro
2021-02-13 14:05                                 ` Lucio De Re
2021-02-13 15:30                                   ` hiro
2021-02-22 18:44                 ` David du Colombier
2021-02-23  4:45                   ` ori
2021-03-19 14:41                     ` Eli Cohen
2021-03-21  0:01                       ` kokamoto
2021-03-21  8:33                         ` David du Colombier
2021-03-21  9:46                           ` hiro
2021-03-21 11:07                             ` David du Colombier
2021-03-21 14:38                           ` David du Colombier
2021-03-21 13:02                         ` Ethan Gardener
2021-02-12 16:39           ` ori
2021-02-10 13:49 ` Steve Simon
2021-02-12 11:09   ` [9fans] 9pi provenance Richard Miller
2021-02-12 11:56     ` pouya+lists.9fans
2021-02-13 14:42       ` David du Colombier
2021-02-13 14:47         ` Richard Miller
2021-02-13 14:53           ` David du Colombier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210211085739.4lwrl3z5pdtsfhae@Krypton \
    --to=staal1978@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).