From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave Eckhardt <davide+p9@cs.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] fuse bashing
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <43D53D9F.90702@lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <20262.1138166979.1@piper.nectar.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:29:39 -0500
Message-ID: <20263.1138166979@piper.nectar.cs.cmu.edu>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e700b16a-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> The big complaints I know of so far on 9P are [...]

If servers routinely dealt with thousands of clients and/or
clients with large persistent caches then some sort of
acceleration for cache validation might be nice--callbacks
(aka leases) or maybe something based on a log of
invalidations.

But given current usage patterns it's not clear there's
a need.

Dave Eckhardt