From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: quanstro@quanstro.net (erik quanstrom)
Date: Sun,  3 Apr 2011 13:46:43 -0400
Subject: [9fans] Go Plan 9
In-Reply-To: <3964FC73-8FBC-4A38-8A0C-38B7B5DD270B@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=nx_okDT-QLfg8mqZ44i5R4QT6RA@mail.gmail.com>
	<033fb4bad1a5301dc98a6c7610c48bd9@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<20110403145714.GF1805@fangle.proxima.alt.za>
	<64dce36b5502bd3ef48f9aff2dee7ff6@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<3964FC73-8FBC-4A38-8A0C-38B7B5DD270B@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20a8a8dc3168fb57a078bee99724cc8e@ladd.quanstro.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c6cdd700-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun Apr  3 12:27:29 EDT 2011, skip.tavakkolian at gmail.com wrote:
> Why can't we use linuxemu to run the build?
> 

sure we could,  but then you have to maintain linuxemu, and
go.  that seems silly.

> Does -fplan9-extensions not do that? Its in the latest gcc for gccgo...

what does gcc have to do with getting go compiled on plan 9?

- erik