From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:59:15 -0400 To: ben@flyingwalrus.net, 9fans@9fans.net, quanstro@coraid.com Message-ID: <20d10285eb2e719a0a962cb4561da74f@coraid.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20080710134615.50C541E8C26@holo.morphisms.net> <4ebdda7ae38da29c42b6e1a049399dd1@coraid.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9? Topicbox-Message-UUID: e3eac558-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu Jul 10 15:06:09 EDT 2008, ben@flyingwalrus.net wrote: > am very interested in nupas, as i have a truely insane number of mails > in my imap store. > > when i use nupas/fs to mount my imap account, i get the following: > > term% nupas/fs -f/imaps/imap.mailhenge.com/ben@hosthenge.com > imap4mbox /imaps/imap.mailhenge.com/ben@hosthenge.com any luck with the changes? - erik