From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] pathetic
Message-ID: <2147483647.1077884766@d207-6-181-125.bchsia.telus.net>
In-Reply-To: <1375223f3c7bef6420b98302686aca19@plan9.bell-labs.com>
References: <1375223f3c7bef6420b98302686aca19@plan9.bell-labs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:26:06 -0800
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 01449dba-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

--On 2004-2-27 8:07 AM -0500 David Presotto <presotto@closedmind.org>
wrote:

> but at least it means they can't fire and forget, they have
> to leave servers up.

I doubt it. They're just going to modify the behaviour of the Windows
spam agents to support pull instead of push. Incoming connections
through NAT are a no-brainer -- the agent just needs to speak a little
UPNP to the gateway.

--lyndon