From: lucio@proxima.alt.za
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] mishandling empty lists - let's fix it
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:10:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <220f0acb467e063064a07738b56bd9cc@proxima.alt.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d50d7d460910051513j3a4139b4q95fea643c0a9769d@mail.gmail.com>
> So I'd welcome commands which
> behave the new way, and I wouldn't have a problem calling them by
> other names.
My thinking is that a shell with slightly different command execution
semantics may be required, together with commands and/or built-in
commands and functions that behave consistently with the shell's
philosophical design.
In addition, I don't think an empty list should ever be implied, or at
minimum ought to be able to be specified explicitly, () would suit me
fine, '' may or may not be a viable alternative.
But we've drifted off a critique of conventional usage to the realms
of philosophical design and the terms of discussion are now very
different.
++L
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-06 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <<20091005055423.GA14691@nipl.net>
2009-10-05 13:30 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-05 16:13 ` Russ Cox
2009-10-05 19:24 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-05 19:31 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-05 21:04 ` John Stalker
2009-10-05 22:13 ` Jason Catena
2009-10-06 10:10 ` lucio [this message]
2009-10-06 2:22 ` ron minnich
2009-10-06 4:37 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-06 4:50 ` ron minnich
2009-10-06 6:40 ` John Stalker
2009-10-06 17:45 ` Brian L. Stuart
2009-10-06 18:00 ` John Stalker
2009-10-06 18:27 ` ron minnich
2009-10-07 8:30 ` John Stalker
2009-10-07 11:05 ` roger peppe
2009-10-06 8:40 ` matt
2009-10-06 16:50 ` John Stalker
2009-10-06 17:15 ` Jason Catena
2009-10-06 17:50 ` Tim Newsham
2009-10-06 19:27 ` John Stalker
2009-10-06 20:10 ` Jason Catena
2009-10-05 21:35 ` Russ Cox
[not found] <<200910071414.aa02318@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
2009-10-07 13:36 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-07 14:02 ` W B Hacker
[not found] <<200910070930.aa64725@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
2009-10-07 12:14 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-07 13:14 ` John Stalker
[not found] <<200910060740.aa94573@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
2009-10-06 12:59 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] <<646955677faa922172207300b93ff6ea@hamnavoe.com>
2009-10-04 18:39 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-03 16:03 Sam Watkins
2009-10-03 17:01 ` Rob Pike
2009-10-03 18:31 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-03 18:56 ` Rob Pike
2009-10-03 19:05 ` blstuart
2009-10-03 19:18 ` hiro
2009-10-03 20:31 ` Steve Simon
2009-10-05 16:08 ` John Stalker
2009-10-05 16:24 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-05 17:20 ` John Stalker
2009-10-05 19:09 ` roger peppe
2009-10-03 18:46 ` Bakul Shah
2009-10-03 19:11 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-04 4:12 ` lucio
2009-10-04 7:17 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-04 9:18 ` lucio
2009-10-05 6:20 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-05 6:53 ` Federico G. Benavento
2009-10-04 10:46 ` Richard Miller
2009-10-06 6:59 ` Uriel
2009-10-06 12:01 ` Jacob Todd
2009-10-04 10:59 ` sqweek
2009-10-05 5:54 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-05 11:23 ` matt
2009-10-04 10:18 ` Charles Forsyth
2009-10-04 10:26 ` lucio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=220f0acb467e063064a07738b56bd9cc@proxima.alt.za \
--to=lucio@proxima.alt.za \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).