From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <2225359c34cba8b34bed094d47f2553b@plan9.escet.urjc.es> From: "Fco. J. Ballesteros" Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:58:29 +0200 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] acme mail "feature" In-Reply-To: <200410011451.i91Ep1U13835@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-fbcefmfqchlvqxexrrouoteqfg" Topicbox-Message-UUID: eb8204a8-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-fbcefmfqchlvqxexrrouoteqfg Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I think so. I think the unix mail tool I used would place an X-something: header to stopre it's flags (read,replied,etc.). --upas-fbcefmfqchlvqxexrrouoteqfg Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline X-Leches: 0 Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by aquamar; Fri Oct 1 16:51:33 MDT 2004 Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id A535F17C5F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:51:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id B0525183C0 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:51:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (psuvax1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26812-01-82 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:51:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from denhaag.ewi.utwente.nl (denhaag.ewi.utwente.nl [130.89.10.11]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 98E88183D3 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:51:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from zeus.cs.utwente.nl (zeus.ewi.utwente.nl [130.89.10.12]) by denhaag.ewi.utwente.nl (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i91Ep2SG022171 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:51:02 +0200 (MEST) Received: from zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl (zamenhof [130.89.13.77]) by zeus.cs.utwente.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i91Ep1Pg015074 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:51:01 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (belinfan@localhost) by zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.10.2) with SMTP id i91Ep1U13835 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:51:01 +0200 (MEST) Message-Id: <200410011451.i91Ep1U13835@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl> X-Authentication-Warning: zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl: belinfan@localhost didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with version: MH 6.8.3 #20[UCI] To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] acme mail "feature" In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:42:07 +0200." <1c9f72654aa8dc055ee1c4b8319ea803@plan9.escet.urjc.es> References: <1c9f72654aa8dc055ee1c4b8319ea803@plan9.escet.urjc.es> From: Axel Belinfante X-Organisation: University of Twente, Department of Computer Science, Formal Methods and Tools Group, PO Box 217, NL-7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands X-Phone: +31 53 4893774 X-Telefax: +31 53 4893247 X-Face: 3YGZY^_!}k]>-k'9$LK?8GXbi?vs=2v*ut, /8z, z!(QNBk_>~:~"MJ_%i`sLLqGN, DGbkT@ N\jhX/jNLTz2hO_R"*RF(%bRvk+M, iU7SvVJtC*\B6Ud<7~`MGMp7rCI6LVp=%k=HE?-UCV?[p\$R? mI\n2/!#3/wZZsa[m7d;PKWiuH6'~ List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: 9fans-bounces+nemo=lsub.org@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-bounces+nemo=lsub.org@cse.psu.edu > Otherwise, placing a `read' mark in the mail should not be hard. > Either a new header isn't that what mail (or Mail or so) on unix (at least solaris) does? > or just in-memory while in upas/fs. Getting off-thread: would it be possible to plan9port upas/fs and acme mail? (guess I should not ask but try, but maybe someone already has an idea whether there would be stumbling blocks, and if so, where) Axel. --upas-fbcefmfqchlvqxexrrouoteqfg--