From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <28dd59bb-f238-4f80-8b29-3863e91184d7@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> From: Abhishek Kulkarni Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:07:38 -0500 Message-ID: <223eadbc1002121007x6a38eeeeweaac01b4c62e07d0@mail.gmail.com> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] Speed of 9pfuse on Linux Topicbox-Message-UUID: d2f4f9f6-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Tim Newsham wrote: >> Convince the Linux community to fix ls - =C2=A0I think the kernel suppor= ts Plan >> 9 style dirread now (there were some bug reports against v9fs suggesting= a >> plan 9 style dirread was possible) but tools haven't yet been updated. > > Any idea how "9 ls" does in p9p? > 9p ls sources 0.315s 9 ls /n/sources 4.012s ls /n/sources 1.918s averaged across 8 runs. >> =C2=A0 -Eric > > Tim Newsham | www.thenewsh.com/~newsham | thenewsh.blogspot.com > >