From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon,  5 Apr 2010 10:32:56 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <22555e0d0b80087b10e2dbfc3b79904e@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <46c225dde2ccb7735f58021ce2295575@hamnavoe.com>
References: <46c225dde2ccb7735f58021ce2295575@hamnavoe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] missing machs unearthed
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fc962672-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> >> My impression is that mp tables are getting worse and worse on new
> >> hardware because vendors assume everyone is running an acpi-aware OS.
> >
> > it's not clear to me that's it's not just general low
> > quality,
>
> Does that imply that we can expect the acpi tables to be often
> incorrect too?  That would be disappointing.

having not done much with acpi, i don't know.  i do
know that things like smb tend not to work right,
often because bios and hw are not quite right.

- erik