From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <225fa8e60605160809v4bd9f518o434087ae05e31b72@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 18:09:34 +0300
From: R <0xef967c36@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] strangely typed functions in standard library
In-Reply-To: <87f034ae0605152003x4d8ee664o4bef08473c10eef6@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <87f034ae0605152003x4d8ee664o4bef08473c10eef6@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 51a59b66-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 5/16/06, Matt Stewart <rotaerk1@gmail.com> wrote:
> The following functions are described as accepting a Rune, but instead
> the parameters are of type long.  Why?
>
> int runelen(long);
> char *utfrune(char *, long);
> char *utfrrune(char *, long);

full unicode is 32 bit, even if plan9 (afaik)
supports only characters in the BMP.