From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <22c463510631709b16d3fcc89dd6dad6@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] fs hardware configuration
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon,  2 Dec 2002 15:27:51 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2bb96b4a-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>> Yes, they're. Our local fs is now the one distributed.
>> We recompiled and booted the resulting binary just to be sure.
>
> With or without the "allow/disallow" commands?  I disabled the former,
> left the latter because I feel more comfortable that way.  But what is
> the released standard?

With them in place.