From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <2332.199.98.17.55.1064587902.squirrel@wish>
In-Reply-To: <015901c3839d$b9da4720$b9844051@insultant.net>
References: <200309251826.h8PIQ7j23163@augusta.math.psu.edu>
     <Pine.LNX.4.33.0309251336110.3289-100000@einstein.ssz.com>
     <1801.199.98.17.54.1064514666.squirrel@wish>
     <015901c3839d$b9da4720$b9844051@insultant.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] ISP filtering - update
From: "Joel Salomon" <salomo3@cooper.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:51:42 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4fe5a4ba-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>> Will someone accept a new name for the anti-neutron? Even with the
>> neutron's charge, an antiparicle *still* exists.
>
> charge?  iirc they are notoriously hard to detect, 'cos they have no
> charge.
>
> or did you mean anti-neuron? ;)
>
>

I was commenting on the "three ways to say something: positive, neutral,
and negative." and the fact that some neutral stimuli can provoke violent
reactions.


--Joel