From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <2371513deb14c7e181f03fb4ea7d3ae6@plan9.escet.urjc.es> From: "Fco. J. Ballesteros" Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:28:21 +0200 To: mteege@gmail.com, 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] fileserver hardware In-Reply-To: <88a4775604092002583bb14003@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-jyvzbfrkfqlhagoiurirgnwvzt" Cc: Topicbox-Message-UUID: e50177ee-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-jyvzbfrkfqlhagoiurirgnwvzt Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit We use a single machine for our auth, venti and fossil. It has 4 IDE disks and is enough four the use we do here. hth --upas-jyvzbfrkfqlhagoiurirgnwvzt Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by aquamar; Mon Sep 20 11:58:34 MDT 2004 Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 6ED1D19B52 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 05:58:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id D825018214 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 05:58:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (psuvax1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02874-01-6 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 05:58:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 02A381820F for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 05:58:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so1141198rnk for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.15.66 with SMTP id 66mr1595733rno; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.70.51 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <88a4775604092002583bb14003@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 11:58:01 +0200 From: Matthias Teege To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cse.psu.edu Subject: [9fans] fileserver hardware X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Teege , Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: 9fans-bounces+nemo=lsub.org@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-bounces+nemo=lsub.org@cse.psu.edu Moin, my fileserver is filled now and I need a new one. What is a recommended configuration? Is it usefull to put cpu- and fileserver on one machine? I don't need much performance. I would like to put all data from all servers (arround 100 GB) on one plan9 fileserver. Many thanks Matthias --upas-jyvzbfrkfqlhagoiurirgnwvzt--