From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) In-Reply-To: <20060607192623.GI28313@submarine> References: <200606071058.35174.corey_s@qwest.net> <20060607204610.GA1330@ionkov.net> <20060607190755.GH28313@submarine> <20060607191725.GA21483@ionkov.net> <20060607192623.GI28313@submarine> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <237DF92E-5E31-410E-BC9E-DD03412444B5@lanl.gov> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Latchesar Ionkov Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9 Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:47:02 -0600 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5b71dcd6-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Jun 7, 2006, at 1:26 PM, Roman Shaposhnick wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 01:17:25PM -0600, Latchesar Ionkov wrote: >> We need support for C++ and Fortran. > > Oh my! It'll be a brand new can worms to open :-( > >> It will use GNU binutils. > > What about libc ? Surely you can't expect UNIX applications > to be happy without libc or better yet glibc. Do you intend > to port it as well ? We will try to use APE. > >> What I am planning to do (and that's what we agreed on the Secret >> Plan 9 Secret Society Society meeting :) is just migrate dhogs >> changes >> to the newest versions of the GNU utils. > > That is a doable thing. But I fail to see what it strives to > accomplish on the application level, unless, of course, the other > "secret pact" was to bring all the GNU cruft (like glibc, libstdc++, > etc.) along the way. We would like to convince some people that Plan9 (kernel) is a useful alternative to Linux without asking them to rewrite all their applications. Like it or not, most people won't consider spending man- months in effort just to check if an alternative is better. Especially if there is not much hype surrounding the alternative :) > > Please explain what's your next step, as far as application > migration is concerned ? As Ron mentioned the immediate objectives are running MPQC and some HPC benchmarks. > > Thanks, > Roman. > > P.S. Sorry for being harsh, but I've just suffered a long porting > effort of the same thing. And let me tell you -- C++/g++ and glibc > ain't pretty beasts. I dread the day they appear anywhere around > Plan9. The GNU apps won't be part of the standard Plan9 distribution, so you can continue to ignore them :) Lucho