From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <239ea8fd0fa9deb395ad0d2af57bdca6@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue,  8 Jul 2008 13:25:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20080708171605.49E881E8C6E@holo.morphisms.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx dns funny
Topicbox-Message-UUID: dec959ea-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I intend 9vx to be a very thin layer atop the host's
> resources, not a second machine that you have
> to administer.  If you want a second machine, there is
> always VMware.

as far as i know, neither plan 9 terminals nor cpu servers
need individual administration.

- erik