From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arisawa <arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <23F46ED5-A8A6-4677-A01E-6CF1BCC51C7D@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 13:42:56 +0900
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
Subject: [9fans] bug in rc(1) ?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2ef645b8-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

rc(1) says:

          rfork [nNeEsfFm]
               Become a new process group using rfork(flags) where
               flags is composed of the bitwise OR of the rfork flags
               specified by the option letters (see fork(2)). If no
               flags are given, they default to ens.  The flags and
               their meanings are: n is RFNAMEG; N is RFCNAMEG; e is
               RFENVG; E is RFCENVG; s is RFNOTEG; f is RFFDG; F is
               RFCFDG; and m is RFNOMNT.

this sounds to me
	rfork
is equivalent to
	rfork ens

or am I misunderstanding?

Kenji Arisawa