From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <23aab6c4b89ffa8c26df13312cda1069@quintile.net> From: "Steve Simon" Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:26:14 +0000 To: 9fans@9fans.net In-Reply-To: <20110218222141.B390D5B44@mail.bitblocks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Modern development language for Plan 9, WAS: Re: RESOLVED: recoving important header file rudely Topicbox-Message-UUID: b19a84a0-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > So why does replica use 9P? Because it's *The Plan 9 Protocol*. If > *The Plan 9 Protocol* turns out to not serve our needs, we need to > figure out why. I really don't get this, what is the problem with replica's speed? I run replica once every week or two and it typically runs for about 30 secconds. This is not a major part of my life, it doesn't stop me working in another window. 9p being slow over high latency links is occasionally an annoyance but replica is not a good example of this. -Steve