From: George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] one reason ideas from Plan 9 didn't catch on
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 08:54:53 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24323.1005692093@apnic.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from presotto@closedmind.org of "Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:58:16 EST." <20011113195826.27824199BB@mail.cse.psu.edu>
> Setting up plan 9 authentication is like giving birth through your eye ball.
This wins my grossest analogy of the year award. EUGHHHHH!
> That's all my fault. Rsc, ehg, and I have been working on a new security
> architecture that makes ssh, ssl, private passwords, etc. easier to keep
> track of and use, sort of sshagent++, in addition to fixing the plan9
> authentication.
This both intrigues and worries me. I use ssh-agent a lot, but I have huge
lingering worries that the chain of open FD back through process history
and the IPC mechanisms is a gaping yaw of risk.
Wouldn't a kerberos tkt like mechanism pose less risks? Isn't the pain of
occaisional re-authentication purposeful? I exclude systems like the SUNray
where a physical token can be removed and moved to carry the auth info.
Having said which, if Plan9 has a clean abstraction for this (and the little
I understand about the mechanisms suggest this strongly) then its a wonderful
idea.
Doesn't it also pose risks for loss of that parent ssh-agent-like thing?
cheers
-george
--
George Michaelson | APNIC
Email: ggm@apnic.net | PO Box 2131 Milton QLD 4064
Phone: +61 7 3367 0490 | Australia
Fax: +61 7 3367 0482 | http://www.apnic.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-13 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-13 19:58 presotto
2001-11-13 20:14 ` William Josephson
2001-11-13 21:39 ` Mike Haertel
2001-11-13 22:42 ` [9fans] Installation mechanism Jim Choate
2001-11-13 22:54 ` Mike Fletcher
2001-11-13 22:54 ` George Michaelson [this message]
2001-11-14 0:19 ` [9fans] one reason ideas from Plan 9 didn't catch on William Josephson
2001-11-13 23:19 ` [9fans] Startup kernel thoughts Chris Hollis-Locke
[not found] <20011112170104.719C619ABA@mail.cse.psu.edu>
2001-12-29 4:03 ` [9fans] one reason ideas from Plan 9 didn't catch on Andrew Simmons
2001-11-13 11:13 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-11-13 15:53 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-11-13 17:21 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-14 18:02 forsyth
2001-11-14 16:08 anothy
2001-11-14 14:43 presotto
2001-11-14 14:29 rob pike
2001-11-15 10:41 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-11-14 9:29 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2001-11-14 8:29 okamoto
2001-11-14 5:24 David Gordon Hogan
2001-11-14 4:42 Russ Cox
2001-11-14 5:12 ` Dan Cross
2001-11-13 23:46 forsyth
2001-11-13 22:18 forsyth
2001-11-13 23:27 ` Chris Hollis-Locke
2001-11-14 4:38 ` Lucio De Re
2001-11-13 21:50 presotto
2001-11-14 0:40 ` Dan Cross
2001-11-13 21:46 Russ Cox
2001-11-13 21:46 Sape Mullender
2001-11-13 21:44 presotto
2001-11-13 21:47 ` andrey
2001-11-13 20:18 David Gordon Hogan
2001-11-13 20:17 David Gordon Hogan
2001-11-13 22:38 ` Jim Choate
2001-11-12 19:24 anothy
2001-11-14 9:52 ` Eyal Lotem
2001-11-12 19:18 David Gordon Hogan
2001-11-13 0:19 ` Jim Choate
2001-11-13 2:02 ` Dan Cross
2001-11-13 2:16 ` Jim Choate
2001-11-13 2:27 ` William Josephson
2001-11-13 10:34 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-11-12 19:15 David Gordon Hogan
2001-11-12 17:06 anothy
2001-11-12 15:10 presotto
2001-11-12 13:14 nigel
2001-11-13 0:03 ` Jim Choate
2001-11-13 18:04 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2001-11-14 9:52 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-11-12 12:17 geoff
2001-11-13 10:25 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-11-12 11:12 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2001-11-12 13:48 ` Jim Choate
2001-11-13 10:27 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-11-13 16:21 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-11-09 9:38 okamoto
2001-11-09 9:21 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2001-11-09 11:23 ` pac
2001-11-12 10:32 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-11-12 10:45 ` David Rubin
2001-11-12 15:34 ` Ronald G Minnich
2001-11-09 7:42 Russ Cox
2001-11-08 14:55 presotto
2001-11-09 10:17 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-11-09 10:17 ` John S. Dyson
2001-11-08 13:46 forsyth
2001-11-09 0:51 ` Jim Choate
2001-11-08 10:40 Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-11-08 12:55 ` Jim Choate
2001-11-09 10:17 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-11-09 14:34 ` T. Kurt Bond
2001-11-10 2:00 ` Jim Choate
2001-11-12 10:33 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-11-12 11:29 ` Ralph Corderoy
2001-11-13 10:27 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-11-12 10:42 ` T. Kurt Bond
2001-11-12 20:24 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-11-13 0:03 ` Jim Choate
2001-11-12 10:33 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24323.1005692093@apnic.net \
--to=ggm@apnic.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).