From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue,  9 Aug 2011 08:54:10 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <24ca190ddaa89af6c29a89757f42b3d1@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <f0ea31d0d41d546a2458944b3fa84c84@quintile.net>
References: <f0ea31d0d41d546a2458944b3fa84c84@quintile.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] (no subject)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0c909b74-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue Aug  9 08:41:44 EDT 2011, steve@quintile.net wrote:
> Subject rfork N
>
> I want to construct a new namespace for an app, including a new root dir.
> I was hoping to do this with a few lines of script starting with rfork N,
> however this seems to be a dead end.
>
> I can still access kernel devices directly using the # escape in filenames,
> which includes '#s/fossil' for my file server. However I cannot get access
> to mount(1) so I can never access any files in that fossil.
>
> is rfork N in rc useless, and do I get a prize for noticing?
>
> (or is it a lack of vision on my behalf as usual?)

don't you just want rfork Nm?

- erik