From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tristan <9p-st@imu.li>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <2579b9.228186c7.D0Vx.mx@tumtum.plumbweb.net>
In-Reply-To: <2579b9.032a3487.pkFh.mx@tumtum.plumbweb.net>
References: <a8a4d75adaf927ca6d650b46859510c5@hamnavoe.com>
	<2579b6.8126cb52.62GS.mx@tumtum.plumbweb.net>
	<504d1e9e6a08271d15827ea4c00507ff@chula.quanstro.net>
	<2579b9.032a3487.pkFh.mx@tumtum.plumbweb.net>
Date: Tue,  6 Mar 2012 10:36:02 -0500
User-Agent: mx-alpha
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] usb slowness
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 66c8959c-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> my working theory is that i'm getting all the interrupts, but not soon
> enough... the fascinating piece is that the olpc and the pc with intel
> ehc take just about the same amount of time.

indeed, if i set the interrupt threshold control to 1 micro-frame (they
default to 8), i get 10-11 sec dd, say, half as slow. and ping time to my
switch is half. and i can get about twice the throughput from the file
server, which is still kinda slow.

(hget yields about 6Mbit over a 100Mbit link)

tristan

--=20
All original matter is hereby placed immediately under the public domain.