From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tristan <9p-st@imu.li>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <20131215224857.Horde.jaGIlSCdzMDpNL0nM-v78Q1@ssl.eumx.net>
References: <CABwHSOs0gy+n6rCJaYDAdM4p8T0b-Vpai9yKzt39332cRRtdHA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20131215224857.Horde.jaGIlSCdzMDpNL0nM-v78Q1@ssl.eumx.net>
Message-Id: <257c42.743e2c7f.lzxB.mx@tumtum.plumbweb.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 17:53:52 -0500
User-Agent: mx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9front vs. 9atom
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9d7e0076-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Quoting Kurt...
> > Is one better maintained than the other?
> Yes.
9atom.

> > Does one have better hardware support than the other?
> Yes.
9front.

> khm
tristan

--=20
All original matter is hereby placed immediately under the public domain.