From: Tristan <9p-st@imu.li>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] mk time-check/slice issue
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:24:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <257c46.39bba3e5.HL59.mx@tumtum.plumbweb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABwHSOvQVt=sDrAGKRVUi-KXs9g9w3o-gYLG1BjPR-vwXucOwg@mail.gmail.com>
> > how long does it take you to run mk, and then realise you didn't Put your
> > last set of changes?
> > i once changed mk on my local machine to act as you suggest, and then
> > took far too long trying to figure out why the program's behavior didn't
> > reflect the code. more time than i saved from waiting on mk? who knows?
> If the situation you describe can happen then it definitely shouldn't be
> changed. Could you please provide me with a scenario (sequence of events)
> that would be a problem if mk was changed? I can't think of one.
i thought i just described one in acme:
change stuff
middle click Put
change more stuff
middle click mk
middle click Put (within the same second of a file's compile)
middle click mk (don't notice that the file wasn't recompiled)
tristan
--
All original matter is hereby placed immediately under the public domain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-19 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-18 22:01 Blake McBride
2013-12-18 22:08 ` Matthew Veety
2013-12-18 22:42 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-18 22:16 ` erik quanstrom
2013-12-18 22:46 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-19 5:40 ` erik quanstrom
2013-12-19 6:07 ` Bakul Shah
2013-12-19 10:59 ` Charles Forsyth
2013-12-19 14:21 ` Oleksandr Iakovliev
2013-12-19 14:58 ` erik quanstrom
2013-12-19 14:52 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-19 14:55 ` erik quanstrom
2013-12-19 15:58 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-19 16:30 ` Tristan
2013-12-19 16:37 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-19 16:40 ` Jacob Todd
2013-12-19 17:05 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-19 17:24 ` Tristan [this message]
2013-12-19 18:30 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-19 17:59 ` Steffen Daode Nurpmeso
2013-12-19 17:07 ` a
2013-12-19 18:40 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-19 18:58 ` Kurt H Maier
2013-12-19 19:06 ` Matthew Veety
2013-12-19 19:07 ` Kurt H Maier
2013-12-19 19:20 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-19 19:27 ` Kurt H Maier
2013-12-19 19:42 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-19 20:02 ` Kurt H Maier
2013-12-19 20:18 ` erik quanstrom
2013-12-19 20:23 ` Kurt H Maier
2013-12-19 19:35 ` a
2013-12-19 19:09 ` a
2013-12-27 10:16 ` dexen deVries
2013-12-19 19:09 ` erik quanstrom
2013-12-19 19:29 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-19 19:39 ` Gabriel Diaz
2013-12-19 20:15 ` Richard Miller
2013-12-19 20:28 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-19 20:45 ` Richard Miller
2013-12-20 15:23 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2013-12-19 19:12 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2013-12-19 19:22 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-19 19:43 ` Rudolf Sykora
2013-12-19 19:58 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-19 19:26 ` sl
2013-12-19 10:01 ` Richard Miller
2013-12-19 15:01 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] <CAC0DbM5safEHO_MFpBazvvH6CcGQXGTow-Fe7fkqkP6GrU1Xzw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAC0DbM7S-xZvOSDwB6KoWH2X8ny_57F9mBE7gaB_BuWR5RSJiw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-12-18 23:09 ` Jason Catena
2013-12-19 5:47 ` erik quanstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=257c46.39bba3e5.HL59.mx@tumtum.plumbweb.net \
--to=9p-st@imu.li \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).