From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon,  4 Jan 2010 16:53:49 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <258040d78423f186e5d0d720a2cd6733@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <74bcefa571f0e47b6710c093cd063c54@quintile.net>
References: <74bcefa571f0e47b6710c093cd063c54@quintile.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] secuser bugs
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b78d5172-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon Jan  4 16:23:56 EST 2010, steve@quintile.net wrote:
> > (in the odd ddmmyyyyy format it used)
>
> We, on this side of the pond, find that format rather modern and exciting;
> not in the least bit old... ☺

i suppose that it has the benefit that it conflicts
with the fileserver's dump format.  plus it sorts incorrectly.

- erik