From: Anant Narayanan <anant@kix.in>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] "Blocks" in C
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 05:21:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25CF9336-C071-44A5-AB04-6BB042BC5755@kix.in> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d375e920909030815n74e481f4yad9814f478db5a78@mail.gmail.com>
On Sep 3, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Uriel wrote:
> Exactly, I still fail to understand the point of this "feature",
> function points have worked fine for ages, but then I never understood
> any religion, and that is what Apple seems to be all about.
Did you even read the article or any of the examples? There are plenty
of things that you can "do" with blocks that you can't with just
function pointers. That's besides the fact that some of them are more
elegantly expressed with blocks that look sort of ugly with function
pointers.
I understand the argument that blocks don't "feel" C-like, but the
argument that you can do everything with just using function pointers
is BS.
--
Anant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-04 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-02 8:04 Anant Narayanan
2009-09-02 9:43 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2009-09-02 11:00 ` Philippe Anel
2009-09-02 11:13 ` Charles Forsyth
2009-09-03 9:52 ` Greg Comeau
2009-09-02 11:40 ` Eris Discordia
2009-09-02 12:32 ` Uriel
2009-09-02 14:20 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2009-09-03 9:52 ` Greg Comeau
2009-09-03 10:48 ` Akshat Kumar
2009-09-03 11:25 ` Charles Forsyth
2009-09-03 13:59 ` Greg Comeau
2009-09-03 15:15 ` Uriel
2009-09-03 15:44 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-03 16:01 ` Roman V Shaposhnik
2009-09-04 9:15 ` Greg Comeau
2009-09-04 16:49 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-09-03 16:02 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-03 18:56 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-03 18:58 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-03 19:13 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-03 19:36 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-03 19:50 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-03 20:30 ` Iruata Souza
2009-09-06 22:35 ` Uriel
2009-09-07 0:41 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-03 21:08 ` Roman V Shaposhnik
2009-09-03 21:35 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-03 21:45 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-03 21:49 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-03 21:51 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-03 22:36 ` Roman V Shaposhnik
2009-09-04 9:16 ` Greg Comeau
2009-09-03 22:10 ` Daniel Lyons
2009-09-03 22:07 ` Daniel Lyons
2009-09-04 9:15 ` Greg Comeau
2009-09-04 3:21 ` Anant Narayanan [this message]
2009-09-04 3:52 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-04 4:18 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-04 4:44 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-04 5:31 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-04 5:35 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-04 7:11 ` Bakul Shah
2009-09-04 7:47 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-04 14:41 ` Bakul Shah
2009-09-04 15:04 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-04 15:58 ` Bakul Shah
2009-09-04 12:14 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-04 13:52 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-04 13:59 ` matt
2009-09-04 14:20 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-04 14:56 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-06 23:03 ` Uriel
2009-09-07 0:45 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-04 16:50 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-09-04 6:45 ` Bakul Shah
2009-09-04 16:44 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-09-04 16:58 ` Iruata Souza
2009-09-04 17:09 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-09-04 17:42 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-04 18:34 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-04 21:54 ` Roman V Shaposhnik
2009-09-07 9:06 ` Greg Comeau
2009-09-07 9:05 ` Greg Comeau
2009-09-07 9:40 ` Uriel
2009-09-08 15:31 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-08 15:44 ` Uriel
2009-09-08 16:40 ` Bakul Shah
2009-09-11 18:15 ` Iruata Souza
2009-09-11 18:46 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-11 20:36 ` Roman V Shaposhnik
2009-09-11 21:28 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-14 16:07 ` Lawrence E. Bakst
2009-09-12 11:08 ` Anant Narayanan
2009-09-13 19:03 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-17 1:54 ` Lawrence E. Bakst
2009-09-17 8:43 ` Charles Forsyth
2009-09-17 9:12 ` Daniel Lyons
2009-09-17 15:56 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-17 17:38 ` Jack Norton
2009-09-17 20:23 ` Anant Narayanan
2009-09-17 20:26 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-17 20:31 ` Anant Narayanan
2009-09-17 20:47 ` Akshat Kumar
2009-09-17 21:02 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-17 22:26 ` Steve Simon
2009-09-17 22:32 ` Roman V Shaposhnik
2009-09-18 2:05 ` Daniel Lyons
2009-09-18 9:30 ` Charles Forsyth
2009-09-18 11:41 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-17 21:03 ` Uriel
2009-09-03 9:52 ` Greg Comeau
2009-09-02 14:08 ` Rodolfo (kix)
2009-09-03 9:52 ` Greg Comeau
[not found] ` <C56117D7BD9A097270529AAE@192.168.1.2>
2009-09-02 15:07 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-02 15:26 ` Roman V Shaposhnik
2009-09-02 15:45 ` David Leimbach
2009-09-03 15:32 ` Uriel
2009-09-03 15:49 ` Roman V Shaposhnik
2009-09-03 15:54 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-03 16:20 ` Roman V Shaposhnik
2009-09-03 16:44 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-04 1:05 ` Roman V Shaposhnik
2009-09-04 1:30 ` Russ Cox
2009-09-04 1:32 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-03 21:54 ` James Tomaschke
2009-09-06 22:26 ` Uriel
2009-09-04 9:04 ` Greg Comeau
2009-09-02 15:20 ` Roman V Shaposhnik
2009-09-02 17:51 ` Bakul Shah
2009-09-04 1:35 drivers
2009-09-04 1:52 ` erik quanstrom
2009-09-17 9:19 Andrew Simmons
2009-09-17 14:45 ` LiteStar numnums
2009-09-17 17:24 ` Daniel Lyons
2009-09-18 15:50 drivers
2009-09-18 15:56 ` erik quanstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25CF9336-C071-44A5-AB04-6BB042BC5755@kix.in \
--to=anant@kix.in \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).