From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <25a93ad0f926053188598ba1ba6c69be@felloff.net>
Date: Sat,  1 Mar 2014 23:22:46 +0100
From: cinap_lenrek@felloff.net
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <5898a072fa92e6b4c1ac1f2af517cba1@mikro.quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] imagereclaim()
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c044aaf6-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

not sure what you mean. the page passed to duppage() is not
on the freelist. and the new page duppage() allocates and
caches is chained on the tail as far as i can see. so
the invariant required by imagereclaim() holds. or are
you refering to a different problem?

--
cinap