From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:39:04 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <2618368964be9bae4cc045fff8c95781@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMdzYRo0fg64MQykCkH2nHDSB=nOauTc66y+8pZGC-T+N9Ldfw@mail.gmail.c>
References: <D2A5C7470D67A54FACE86B838946D49D14E466F692@NJ4MSGSCR02.markit.partners>
	<CAMdzYRo0fg64MQykCkH2nHDSB=nOauTc66y+8pZGC-T+N9Ldfw@mail.gmail.c>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] IL depreciated
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 894cbb16-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>
> Does anyone know what it is about IL's design that means it doesn't
> handle long-distance connections well?

i can't think of anything that's inherent or fundamental to the protocol.
on the other hand, i don't use il over the internet since it's not encrypted.
tls over the internet makes much more sense to me.

- erik