From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <268C756C-4B08-4266-8D7E-1247A45F8577@gmail.com>
From: Patrick Kelly <kameo76890@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <14ec7b180909211812m8d29529u92fc2c4bbd05cba5@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:26:53 -0400
References: <13426df10909210922k6dec156ax1051cfe28a00b463@mail.gmail.com>
	<4AB7BACC.2000004@0x6a.com>
	<72B06B41-1471-4DA1-B225-E0FD86B56A56@gmail.com>
	<3e1162e60909211232j48d15b5du2b471500518ecb4@mail.gmail.com>
	<1D279178-C279-499C-AB77-BD328672B2A3@gmail.com>
	<14ec7b180909211812m8d29529u92fc2c4bbd05cba5@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] linux stats in last year from linuxcon
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7420b56e-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


On Sep 21, 2009, at 9:12 PM, andrey mirtchovski wrote:

> it's on slashdot, it must be true:
>
> "During a roundtable discussion at LinuxCon in Portland, Oregon this
> afternoon, moderator and Novell distinguished engineer James Bottomley
> asked Tovalds whether Linux kernel features were being released too
> fast, before the kernel is stabilized.
>
> Citing an internal Intel study that tracked kernel releases, Bottomley
> said Linux performance had dropped about two per centage points at
> every release, for a cumulative drop of about 12 per cent over the
> last ten releases. "Is this a problem?" he asked.
>
> "We're getting bloated and huge. Yes, it's a problem," said Torvalds."

So may be Tanenbaum was right, after all, there's a reason we make
things modular.
>
> well, not really slashdot:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09/22/linus_torvalds_linux_bloated_huge/
>
> Ron, did you throw anything at Linus while you were there? :)
>