From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:59:37 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <26bc30cedee2b4beddfb4f6e0e97465c@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <2dc159076288ada480674c4e00a70055@hamnavoe.com>
References: <2dc159076288ada480674c4e00a70055@hamnavoe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 5l
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f631aa84-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed Dec 12 17:54:09 EST 2012, 9fans@hamnavoe.com wrote:
> >  most likely because Lock
> > is different in each scope.
>
> /sys/src/*/dat.h defines Lock, /sys/include/libc.h defines it differently.
> You may be trying to link a kernel with some function like lock() coming
> from libc instead of its own version.

yes, yes, all correct.  i misread the diagnostic.  sorry for the noise.

- erik