From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:23:03 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <26c21ed605e201dcad928e22c7ec360c@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAEAzY3-V=beXd7xS856acR68yFWyrtm=wTcjejZ+N-sQCfK6ZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c6ae82c24cabd68a535451350749816c@gmx.de>
	<e5998a9a676a19522953a416aee2dc43@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<20130727074822.50f9af70@Krypton>
	<906e7ed0e591c1125838c17258440bb6@kw.quanstro.net>
	<CAEAzY3-V=beXd7xS856acR68yFWyrtm=wTcjejZ+N-sQCfK6ZA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] MirOS ksh (mksh) building out-of-the box on Plan9/APE
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6e6da2be-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sat Jul 27 11:12:59 EDT 2013, aram.h@mgk.ro wrote:
> > go does not use ape.
>
> That is irrelevant to what he said.

the question at hand was the emulation of SIGCLD,
which on plan 9 is an ape-specific question.

go can't have it both ways.  either it needs to have a
solution that doesn't rely on SIGCLD, or it needs to
be ported to ape, where SIGCLD makes sense and the
ape runtime can be extendedto support it.

- erik