From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <2701455c7c46f432ff5cc8112a8a8f8d@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:58:12 -0500
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] ^ and $ in structural expressions
In-Reply-To: <b954b2060802290753w2428f7a4wd3a3d5b65029a927@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 68df9eec-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

i'm not arguing for or against the idea here, just want to point
out that i don't think syntax is the limiting factor.

if =C2=AB and =C2=BB are not acceptable, then we can reuse existing chara=
cters.
having ^ and $ loose their idempotency would not be a large inconvience.
^^ and $$ could easily do.

adding an expression anchor should not be a major complication.

- erik