>>I'm afraid that I am serious about USB 2 needing OCHI code (unless the
>>OCHI interface is compatible with the UCHI interface, but I can't
>>believe we'd be so lucky with PC hardware).

OHCI is significantly different from UHCI.  both do slightly odd things.
you get over it, in time.

>>USB 2.0, if you turn the clock speed up. I imagine, though I don't
>>know, that those organisations keen to promote USB 2.0 just preferred
>>to develop OHCI because the already had silicon IP in that style.

i suspect the problem with using UHCI is the patents/licence, in other
words the deal from Intel for all those nasty clone makers, hence the O for Open
in OHCI.  that's what i remember, but it might be wrong.

>>I've written an OHCI driver for non PCI (i.e. embedded) silicon for an
>>operating system not unlike Plan 9; it's not mine to give away. The first

i'll see if i can.  could save some time if so.