From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <27ef1a05d9c20a587ef59bd2c59759bf@terzarima.net> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: venti+fossil problems on new install From: Charles Forsyth Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:08:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8b2d1dd7ac49c48a0b3c0b031c6b77ff@plan9.bell-labs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: bcf137f4-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Did I look at the wrong thread? I thought the original message > showed the drives configured OK (without DMA...) but there were > errors in the configuration steps after that. No? no, i think that's right. i was answering (or trying to address) erik's objection that it was impossible for a device without its ID in the pcimatch loop to be recognised at all. as jmk had observed earlier, if it's at the normal address, as the other chap's drive had been (according to the config data printed), it will be (and was) recognised. if it's at the normal address(es), the device will be picked up there, SATA or not, and does not need to be handled by the later pcimatch loop (which would ignore unlisted cards).