From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <283e5874d3775af976d01e9bee39b8b9@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:35:39 -0500
From: jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] ethernet detection problems
In-Reply-To: <32d987d50511242200i31ed277fid4f46aa7de5249eb@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b1a1e192-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri Nov 25 01:01:48 EST 2005, benavento@gmail.com wrote:
> > > % diff -c /n/dump/2005/1106/sys/src/9/pc/ether83815.c
> > /sys/src/9/pc/ether83815.c
> > > /n/dump/2005/1106/sys/src/9/pc/ether83815.c:81,86 -
> > > /sys/src/9/pc/ether83815.c:81,87
> > >
> > >   enum {        /* Variants */
> > >     Nat83815  = (0x0020<<16)|0x100B,
> > > +   Sis900 = (0x0630<<16)|0x1039, /* untested */
> > >   };
> > >
> 
> hmm, this didn't work for me either that's why I'm still using
> Andrey's driver. Now seing the code closely I think I know
> where the problem is, I haven't tested it yet, but I think this will work.
> 
>  Sis900 = (0x0900<<16)|0x1039,
> 
> --
> Federico G. Benavento

If you look in /lib/pci, (0x0900<<16)|0x1039 would seem to be
the logical choice.

--jim