From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <283f5df1050825074268e37f05@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:42:05 -0400
From: LiteStar numnums <litestar@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] problems booting a new install
In-Reply-To: <002501c5a980$f90b42e0$e000a8c0@OBLIVIONDT>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <f9df42b7c5d3876bb2c68970a2c0425e@plan9.bell-labs.com>
	<ee9e417a05082418014d7a7b89@mail.gmail.com>
	<126a2f7d05082504183f9e65d4@mail.gmail.com>
	<82c890d0050825052514b1951f@mail.gmail.com>
	<002501c5a980$f90b42e0$e000a8c0@OBLIVIONDT>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7e59663e-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Did you try typing glenda?

On 8/25/05, Ezequiel Reyes <ezequiel.reyes@newhotel.co.cu> wrote:
> I just installed a plan 9 system on sdC0, configured the plan9.ini on 9fa=
t
> and the system boots well to the point of showing:
>=20
> user[none]:
>=20
> I guess there is no user defined after install so I go on with none and t=
his
> is the output:
>=20
> kfs ... File system main inconsistent
> Would you like to ream (y/n)? bad nvram key
> bad authentication id
> bad authentication domain
>     tag : Tnone; expected Tdir; addr =3D 2
> kfs init7 : FID1 attach to root
> kfs 7: suicide: sys: trap: fault read addr=3D0x0 pc=3D0x0001cae4
> version ... panic: boot process died: sys: write on closed pipe
> pc=3D0x00007858
> dumpstack disabled
> cpu: exiting
>=20
> these are the main variables in my ini file:
>=20
> bootfile=3DsdC0!9fat!9pcdisk
> bootargs=3Dlocal!#S/sdC0/fossil
>=20
> there was a nobootprompt as well in the .ini file I took has a reference =
for
> modification with value: local!boot/bzboot
> But I saw no reference to it on the plan9.ini man page. So I tried coment=
ing
> and uncomenting it, no results.
> Is it a problem with my root not defined in the ini? Need I use rootdir o=
r
> something? which would be the path?
>=20
>=20


--=20
The subject of this essay (the Myth of Sisyphus) is precisely
this relationship between the absurd and suicide, the exact
degree to which suicide is a solution to the absurd. The=20
principle can be established that for a man who does not cheat,
what he believes to be true must determine his action.
Belief in the absurdity of existence must then dictate his
conduct. It is legitimate to wonder, clearly and without
false pathos, whether a conclusion of this importance
requires forsaking as rapidly possiblean imcompre-
hensible condition. I am speaking, of course, of men
inclined to be in harmony with themselves.
  << Albert Camus>>