From: "LiteStar numnums" <litestar@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Planning a two-machine heterogeneous LAN
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 20:28:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <283f5df10607091728t6a97dd8brc52aefad81b2c026@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3803a2bc5699df802e8c1b21315d86cc@quanstro.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1475 bytes --]
KVMs are very useful... TrendNet has 4 port PS/2 KVMs for sub-$50USD...
In fact, NewEgg has the four port listed for $35USD + S&H. Easy enough...
-S
On 7/9/06, quanstro@quanstro.net <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>
> i think the answer is neither.
>
> i use a kvm switch.
>
> - erik
>
> On Sun Jul 9 13:17:01 CDT 2006, ru@river.org wrote:
> > Using Firefox has its irritations, but it is _more_ irritating to
> > use Firefox via VNC from a Plan 9 terminal than to use it on the
> > Linux box on which the Firefox is running.
> >
> > Likewise, using a Plan 9 cpu server via Drawterm running on Linux
> > is _more_ irritating than using the same cpu server as a Plan 9
> > terminal.
> >
> > My question is, which delta of irritation is greater: that of
> > having to use Plan 9 remotely from Drawterm _or_ that of having
> > to use one of the big, popular web browsers remotely (via VNC or
> > whatever the cool people are using to connect to Linux or
> > Windows) from a Plan 9 terminal?
> >
> > Assume the Linux and the Plan 9 are connected via 100Mbs
> > ethernet.
> >
> > The answer to the question will determine which
> > machine I hook my keyboard and mouse up to.
>
--
Lead thou me on, O Zeus, and Destiny,
To that goal long ago to me assigned.
I'll follow and not falter; if my will
Prove weak and craven, still I'll follow on.
-- Epictetus
He who enters his wife's dressing room is a philosopher or a fool. -- Balzac
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1941 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-10 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-09 18:15 Richard Uhtenwoldt
2006-07-09 23:21 ` quanstro
2006-07-10 0:28 ` LiteStar numnums [this message]
2006-07-10 7:41 ` Sascha Retzki
2006-07-10 9:14 ` LiteStar numnums
2006-07-10 15:15 ` Ronald G Minnich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=283f5df10607091728t6a97dd8brc52aefad81b2c026@mail.gmail.com \
--to=litestar@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).