On 7/18/06, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:

I wonder when AdaOS will be done? :-)

On 7/18/06, LiteStar numnums < litestar@gmail.com> wrote:
> You all seem to forget that this is a merging of anal retentive technologies
> from a US government bureacracy and the anarchy of 'Linux', which is not
> really a single anything accept a tree with lots and lots of code. This is
> the same US goverment (although not the same bureaucracy) that unleashed
> NIEM ( niem.gov) onto the world, XML with no less than NINE NAMESPACES,
> which is supposed to be used for critical (read: things like 'Oh, the
> leavies may have been breached') data...
> On a lighter note, I've always been happy with TrustedBSD & TrustedSolaris,
> or OpenVMS ;-)
>
>
> On 7/18/06, David Leimbach < leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7/18/06, Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov> wrote:
> > > David Leimbach wrote:
> > >
> > > > It (SELINUX) was easily turned off with a switch in a conf file, but
> > > > it's such a pain in the ass, I don't know why it's in a "FC" style
> > > > distribution at all.
> > >
> > > The bigger question, which I can't quite figure out yet, is does selinux
> > > provide some magic dust that in turn provides a level of security not
> > > attainable any other way (i.e. in something like Plan 9) ... or, is it a
> > > set of hacks to cover for an obsolete way of doing things. I am tending
> > > toward thinking the latter, now that I've worked with it a bit. Watch
> > > the discussions on labeling files, it's interesting, because the label
> > > namespace seems to be fragmenting already.
> > >
> > > ron
> > >
> >
> > It's very clearly add-on technology to make up for something people
> > felt was unmanageable in Unix.  However do we really need both ACLs
> > and SELINUX contexts?  Do our files really need to have named hidden
> > data to store this crap in?
> >
> > I've honestly not read any papers justifying the need for ACLs or
> > SELINUX controls.
> >
> > I suddenly miss DOS.
> >
> > Dave
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Lead thou me on, O Zeus, and Destiny,
> To that goal long ago to me assigned.
> I'll follow and not falter; if my will
> Prove weak and craven, still I'll follow on.
>  -- Epictetus
>
> He who enters his wife's dressing room is a philosopher or a fool. -- Balzac