Clozure might be enough as well; it's C, but I've no idea how many POSIXisms are in the source...
Last time I looked into this, I was comparing different version of aOn Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:54 PM, John Floren<slawmaster@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:47 AM, LiteStar numnums<litestar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Well, lisp != common lisp aside, I wouldn't mind a native CL system. I
>> haven't looked at the SBCL backend in quite sometime, but, assuming it's not
>> terribly insane, that would be a decent route. Most CL work that isn't
>> specific to one of the proprietary systems (Allegro, LispWorks, &c.) is
>> written with SBCL or, to a lesser extent, CCL. If anyone's interested in
>> working on a CL port to plan9, I'll start a lisp cabal, that can work on
>> other systems next.
>>
>> I'll look today...
> [previous message and grotesque signature snipped]
>
> One challenge with SBCL and some other implementations is that you
> need a Common Lisp system already in place to compile them. I looked
> into Clisp, which can be compiled with a C compiler, but after
> fighting configure for a while I quit.
>
common lisp systems to see which one might be easy enough to port
during the weekend. I remember I dropped to at least 3
1. gcl-1.0
2. ecl-8.12
3. clisp -- I guess I can remove this from my list
fernan
--
http://www.fernski.com