Re: [9fans] a jmp_buf in APE question

[Jens Staal <staal1978@gmail.com>]

måndagen den 7 januari 2013 06.15.08 skrev  erik quanstrom:

> 
> yes, i think it would be unwise.  i think you mean
> 
> 		sp = ((uintptr*)jb)[0]
> 		pc = ((uintptr*)jb)[1]
> 

yeah sorry I did not mean it to look like C-code and the paranthesis was meant 
to indicate that jb got #defined to jmp_buf.

> > this is how other similar ports of this package (GNU portable threads)
> > have
> > been made, for example for win32
> 
> it's just my opinion.  i would see such code as peeking through
> an deliberately-opaque interface.  and to me that's almost always
> a bad idea.  even if it works, and even if other people do it.
> 
> others might have other thoughts.
> 
> - erik

I thank you for your feedback and help I did the build despite your warnings, 
and the result can be found either at:

http://code.google.com/p/ports2plan9/downloads/list

or:

/n/sources/contrib/staal1978/pkg

Tests and pre-compiled test binaries can also be found at:

/n/sources/contrib/staal1978/pkg/pth_test

There are some scary stuff in there, like the test_sig result, but others seem 
to work...