From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <29889def34d6e05a1c8644fbdd24c1e9@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:14:25 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <140e7ec30903311939l5a793622v33c7c82d16d2eacd@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] what features would you like in a shell?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cf212a3a-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>  re not reinventing the wheel, you might want to look into the es
> shell. I think this is what erik alluded to earlier - I've never used
> it myself but I understand it is extremely programmable, to the point
> where you can redefine the pipe operator for example.

; %pipe {echo true} 1 0 cat
true
; fn %pipe {echo $* ; $&pipe $*}; echo fu | cat
{echo fu} 1 0 {cat}
fu

- erik