From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <298cb834353c974eaa1cf963b4818f4c@coraid.com>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:21:16 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <775b8d190803141454t3fd39130s34ff7f179169e8d4@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] abaco @ plan9port [WAS: Hi and,
	plan9-native abaco sources?]
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 79d5917a-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> is there anything that breaks if we take an adhoc approach to ignoring
> standards? who needs URLs anyway if you are too lazy for them. you are
> not too lazy to complain.

i don't see how providing code & and argument for the code
is complaining.  i didn't bring this subject up.

as i see it, convienence takes text that is nor a valid uri and
converts it to a valid uri.  how does this qualify as ignoring the
standard?

- erik