From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Simon <steve@quintile.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Tue,  2 Oct 2018 18:26:12 +0100
Message-Id: <29FFEB83-BA13-4083-891C-257704A1FECD@quintile.net>
References: <20181002113028.kucfal5ffcjjk7ky@v520.kathe.in>
	<CAG2UyHov1knakZF1fPCHHj4rarCa17reDK0=6270o8jru499TA@mail.gmail.com>
	<7E20FBE4-C08A-4C98-8051-7A51542E2B55@bitblocks.com>
In-Reply-To: <7E20FBE4-C08A-4C98-8051-7A51542E2B55@bitblocks.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system : kernel : freebsd || linux
	?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e51f420e-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

maybe this is what you meant, but the glendix project was this - approximate=
ly.

Steve

> On 2 Oct 2018, at 6:22 pm, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
>> On Oct 2, 2018, at 7:41 AM, Dave MacFarlane <driusan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> see how far you can take the per process
>> namespaces of Linux
>> to make it feel like Plan 9. (AFAIK, that wouldn't be possible with
>> NetBSD or FreeBSD, but
>> I might be mistaken..)
>=20
> Adding per process namespaces to *BSD would be a nontrivial project.