9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Fran. J Ballesteros" <nemo@lsub.org>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] adding TCP half-duplex close
Date: Sun,  5 Feb 2017 08:54:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2E17A451-F68D-41A2-907B-ABFF797846C7@lsub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJSxfm+8pQN84FcxLEhypAwzWit1p7YdXYkXNcojuhArFOA_jQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1671 bytes --]

I used half closes to put go chans in the network for my weird chan based network
calls. 
But the code works without such feature. 
Being just that, I dont know if it counts. 

> El 5 feb 2017, a las 5:39, Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com> escribió:
> 
> yes, i'm still trying to find a real situation where this would be critical. i asked go-nuts list for production examples at the same time as the start of this thread. no answers yet.
> 
>> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 3:31 AM Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com> wrote:
>> it's also funny that the rationale seems to be to pass the same conformance test for Go that once had it added to Inferno so it would pass a Java test but it was never otherwise used for reasons already given, so I took it out again.
>> 
>> On 4 February 2017 at 10:11, Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I did once have a use for this in an o/s of mine, in a sort of network pipe to servers, but it was so variably implemented by other systems (data was flushed, or not) I gave it up as not particularly useful in practice, except between two known systems that did what you wanted.
>> 
>> On 4 February 2017 at 09:58, Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On 4 February 2017 at 01:56, Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Shutting down the write-end (i.e. 'shut_wr'), should send FIN, and transition to Finwait1.
>> 
>> i'd make it a "read" or "write" parameter to the existing "hangup" message. older implementations that don't accept the parameter will give an error on the request because the current tcp.c doesn't accept a parameter
>> 
>> 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3630 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-05  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-04  1:56 Skip Tavakkolian
2017-02-04  6:29 ` Bakul Shah
2017-02-05  4:24   ` Skip Tavakkolian
2017-02-04  9:58 ` Charles Forsyth
2017-02-04 10:11   ` Charles Forsyth
2017-02-04 10:13     ` Charles Forsyth
2017-02-05  4:39       ` Skip Tavakkolian
2017-02-05  5:23         ` Bakul Shah
2017-02-05 15:51           ` Charles Forsyth
2017-02-05 15:54             ` Charles Forsyth
2017-02-05 18:13               ` Bakul Shah
2017-02-05 21:48                 ` Charles Forsyth
2017-02-10  8:49                   ` Skip Tavakkolian
2017-02-12  3:28                     ` Skip Tavakkolian
2017-02-05  7:54         ` Fran. J Ballesteros [this message]
2017-02-05  4:16   ` Skip Tavakkolian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2E17A451-F68D-41A2-907B-ABFF797846C7@lsub.org \
    --to=nemo@lsub.org \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).