From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <2aab0c267882f16e9ce77d5b9ff0f5a8@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp> To: russcox@gmail.com, 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] browse /sys/src From: Kenji Okamoto Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:28:54 +0900 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3575a6aa-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 > Lucent insists on the click-through for the official distribution, > but the terms of the Lucent Public License do not require > it of others. (This is in contrast to the Plan 9 License, > which did.) There is at least already one external site > already that makes much of the Plan 9 source available > without a click-through: the plan9port site. I believe, because I haven't got it, plan9port is only a part of Plan9, I mean, by only those we cannot run Plan 9. > I think the web interface to sources that Yamanashi set > up is quite nice. I doubt this. Web can be reached from anyone who wants, even he/she is a terrorist etc, I don't mean the word same as Iqaqi etc. We, academic community is 'open', anyone can get the resources we developed. However, if you want to enter the community, you have to be evaluated before. In this sense, academic community is not completely 'open'. However, we don't believe it's not open. I'd like the Plan 9 community is as such. I don't brame click-through procedure of Lucent, because it's just like the above I mentioned. I still believe moral term. Kenji