From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <2aff67e2a0eba2b56a44439fe3cf4649@collyer.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: SMTP+SPF (was: [9fans] Re: new release?)
From: Geoff Collyer <geoff@collyer.net>
In-Reply-To: <d5790b0f666f8054c728816c75b8f4eb@plan9.ucalgary.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:51:21 -0800
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f768ee04-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

SPF shares the same central fallacy as most anti-spam methods and as
the Department of Homeland Security: if we can just identify the
weasels, then they'll be in big trouble, oh boy, you just watch!  I'd
prefer that carry-on luggage be scanned and that spam be held at the
sender.