From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <2b23b90f4c9401ade1537949ec3180b0@swtch.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9p(1) rdwr, but return all records? con?
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@swtch.com>
Date: Wed,  8 Mar 2006 21:46:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <509071940603081838s14bb9271lb005cdaa4af75bd0@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0ff3783c-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> In examining 9p.c in preparation to roll my own, i came across an
> undocumented command: con. This seems to be very close (if not
> exactly) what i'd like. I've not been able to test it successfully
> yet, but i'm pretty sure i don't currently have any served resources
> that *don't* do what cs and friends do regarding looking for
> outstanding request on a fd. Does this sound plausible? Might con be
> what i (and others) are looking for?

Why not try it and find out?
Surely you could answer this question better than anyone else.

Russ