* [9fans] another dual-atom motherboard: jetway nc92-330
@ 2009-08-05 9:03 Richard Miller
2009-08-05 11:38 ` erik quanstrom
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Miller @ 2009-08-05 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
When my dual-processor VIA motherboard blew up, I cast about
for a quick replacement and ended up with a Jetway NC92-330-LF.
This is similar to Steve's Intel D945GCLF2 board (not to be
confused with Erik's supermicro X7SLA), but slightly more
expensive. For the extra money you get extra expansion
via Jetway-proprietary daughterboards, a normal sized heatsink
compared to the Intel's very tall one, and a normal 20-pin
atx power connector compared to the Intel's newer 24-pin one.
Jetway NC91-330 is the same thing without the daughterboard
connector.
Experiences:
- sata disk and ide dvd/rw worked immediately with standard kernel
- rtl8111c gigabit ethernet worked after adding a new Macv
code to the driver (patch ether8169-rtl8111c submitted)
- smp didn't work at first (crashed on boot) because the bios
initialises the mp configuration table with rubbish - possibly
due to confusion over hyperthreading, there are two processor
entries in the mp table, but the bios stores CPUIDs for four
entries, thus clobbering the following bus descriptor entries.
This happens whether or not hyperthreading is enabled in the bios.
As a workaround I just patch the correct bus entries back into
the mp table - see contrib/miller/jetway-nc92-330/mp.c, which
I will one day re-do more elegantly before submitting as a patch.
- vesa works beautifully at 1600x1200x16, but only with *nomp=1.
Luckily there's a pci slot for a vga card.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] another dual-atom motherboard: jetway nc92-330
2009-08-05 9:03 [9fans] another dual-atom motherboard: jetway nc92-330 Richard Miller
@ 2009-08-05 11:38 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-05 11:55 ` Richard Miller
2009-08-05 13:52 ` Charles Forsyth
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: erik quanstrom @ 2009-08-05 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Wed Aug 5 05:05:26 EDT 2009, 9fans@hamnavoe.com wrote:
> and a normal 20-pin atx power connector compared
> to the Intel's newer 24-pin one.
note that a 24-pin connector is preferable. my atom
mb has a 24 pin connector but it is sold with a 20 pin
power supply. the extra 4 pins are not required, but
they do give one extra flexability in selecting a power
supply.
this is analogous to having a 16-lane pcie connector
rather than an 8-lane pcie connector.
just to defend the intel and supermicro motherboards's
sata (it has nothing to do with the processor or motherboard):
this is an intel bug that i've verified exists on the following
southbridges: ich0, ich5, ich7r, ich9, ich9m, ich10r. the bug manifests
when using sata disks in ide mode. there is no problem
using sata disks in ahci mode or ide disks in ide mode.
i think defending against this bug will greatly reduce the number
of install failures.
anyway to contrast with the x7sla you have:
jetway x7sla-h
gbe 1 2x
mptables no yes
s.b. ich7 ich7r
p/sata 1/2 1/4 (ahci)
mem 1 2 slots
pci/pcie 1/0 1/2
audio yes no
fan "noisy" "quieter than my mouse"
here's the url for the jetway:
http://www.jetway.com.tw/jw/ipcboard_view.asp?productid=573&proname=NC92-330-LF
'
- erik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] another dual-atom motherboard: jetway nc92-330
2009-08-05 11:38 ` erik quanstrom
@ 2009-08-05 11:55 ` Richard Miller
2009-08-05 13:52 ` Charles Forsyth
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Miller @ 2009-08-05 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> note that a 24-pin connector is preferable. my atom
> mb has a 24 pin connector but it is sold with a 20 pin
> power supply. the extra 4 pins are not required
I didn't know that - thought I would have to get a new power supply.
> anyway to contrast with the x7sla you have:
>
> jetway x7sla-h
> ... ...
You missed an important distinction:
jetway x7sla-h
mini-itx flex-atx
I was replacing a via board in a mini-itx sized case.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] another dual-atom motherboard: jetway nc92-330
2009-08-05 11:38 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-05 11:55 ` Richard Miller
@ 2009-08-05 13:52 ` Charles Forsyth
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Charles Forsyth @ 2009-08-05 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
>the extra 4 pins are not required, but
>they do give one extra flexability in selecting a power
>supply.
the original uniprocessor intel atom board required
the extra 4 pin connection to be made (or bodged).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-05 13:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-05 9:03 [9fans] another dual-atom motherboard: jetway nc92-330 Richard Miller
2009-08-05 11:38 ` erik quanstrom
2009-08-05 11:55 ` Richard Miller
2009-08-05 13:52 ` Charles Forsyth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).