From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <2b7b4cc199ac9ba80302fb8cb0dfb3e4@mail.gmx.net> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] missing applications From: "Sascha Retzki" Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:25:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20060725102937.GF1836@XTL.antioffline.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8c94e164-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > - Good tiling window management. I won't go back to handling any window > borders with a mouse. Hm, I find that one a bit funny. I actually enjoy that - maybe I missed the latest news in the control-windows-with-vi-like-keys technologies(tm) (yeah I tried wmi once)? A full-screen button is the only thing that I miss sometimes. Pressing a key and acme is fullscreen ;) A mouse is a damn intuitiv interface as it behaves pretty much like a single finger. imho > - Threaded news & mail reader(s). Those always confused me - I hate it. > - Perhaps something like tor, I did not check, but I guess they just enculapse a e.g. TCP/IP-paket into $something? Sounds like a /net-like fs can do the trick then. > a filtering proxy, What's that? Squid? What do you filter? What protocol? Pakets or content of pakets? > NAT for others, Yeah. See my post about it. ;) > neat (snmp?) monitoring apps, I recall gabriel (sorry, are you spelled that way?) has done something wrt SNMP. No idea if it is neat. > packet filtering etc might be a way to sneak it to some lone servers. 9pf!! Paket filtering is your last security wall - proper updates, an infrastructure with security in mind etc are the first things to be done. Furthermore, as you statted, Plan9 ain't really work as a 'router' (no NAT etc) in an environment where you need such thing. Anyway, I agree paket filtering would be usefull. > > Outside that, good terminal emulation with ssh would be one bridge I'm > not sure that is available. vt(1) works for me(tm). Okay, I just occassionally edit config files with vi and normally just use vt and ssh to shut machines down ;) > I didn't find an irc client that wasn't a complete mess to use either. I enjoy using irc7[0]. The 'server' posts a file in /srv and the clients connect to that - a nice solution as you can now start up ircsrv and then start a 'win' for every channel you want to be in (in acme I mean) and then do irc -t '#channel' There is also Acme-irc (Irc) which basicly does the same - create several acme windows for each channel. Never worked for me on plan9, I was told it was done for P9P. In the end I did not care enough and just used irc7. [0]: 9fs sources ; cp /n/sources/contrib/andrey/irc7.tgz $home