From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 20:55:06 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <2bcd98cbd031cf8ac798987c56fcbc3c@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAEAzY3-Fp2t87LNYCW_V7v9Zd_nf0rhL0paKn8c-TEO7UZF2fg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c6ae82c24cabd68a535451350749816c@gmx.de>
	<e5998a9a676a19522953a416aee2dc43@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<20130727074822.50f9af70@Krypton>
	<906e7ed0e591c1125838c17258440bb6@kw.quanstro.net>
	<CAEAzY3-V=beXd7xS856acR68yFWyrtm=wTcjejZ+N-sQCfK6ZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<26c21ed605e201dcad928e22c7ec360c@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<20130727213936.GA22631@intma.in>
	<d34d6ce6c7d5b8da53d3bf53fd8f739e@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<CAEAzY3-Fp2t87LNYCW_V7v9Zd_nf0rhL0paKn8c-TEO7UZF2fg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] MirOS ksh (mksh) building out-of-the box on Plan9/APE
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6e8be86e-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sat Jul 27 18:41:08 EDT 2013, aram.h@mgk.ro wrote:
> > SIGCHLD is not defined for plan 9, except in ape.  that's what i
> > would call ape-specific.
>
> You're intentionally missing the point.

i don't think so.  ape must solve the sigchld problem since that
is a posix interface, and ape's raison d'etre is posix emulation.
go, not using ape and not implemeting posix, does not.  also since we
only have to worry about go, we can take a look at its specific use
of sigchld and figure out another implementation.  if the runtime is
using it, then it would be easy enough to just generate a note on exit.

- erik